Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Society's Membership Transfer Denied Over Missing Documents

Updated
Mar 13, 2026 11:25 AM
bombay-hc-societys-membership-transfer-denied-over-missing-documents

Summary: The Bombay High Court, led by Justice Amit Borkar, decided against Romila Dilip Bajaj in a case about transferring membership in the Rashmi Co-op Housing Society, Mumbai. The court stressed the importance of having the right paperwork and following the rules of the cooperative society.

Background: The Dispute Begins

This case started when Rashmi Co-operative Housing Society, based in Mumbai, challenged a decision from August 30, 2019. The problem was about transferring membership from Jolly Brothers Private Limited to Romila Dilip Bajaj. The society had turned down several applications for this transfer over the years.

Initial Attempts: Multiple Rejections

  • 1965: Jolly Brothers became a member of the society.
  • 2011: Romila Dilip Bajaj applied for membership, which was turned down on March 14 and again on July 20.
  • 2013-2014: Another application was sent in and rejected.
  • 2016: Bajaj's appeal was allowed, but Rashmi Co-operative Housing Society filed a request to review the decision.

Legal Arguments: The Society's Stand

Mr. Surel Shah, speaking for Rashmi Co-operative Housing Society, argued that the applications were not valid because they didn't have a registered transfer document. He stressed that the society's rules and past decisions should be followed.

"No valid transfer can be recognized without a registered document," argued Mr. Shah.

Counterarguments: Bajaj's Defense

Mr. Anil Anturkar, speaking for Romila Dilip Bajaj, referred to the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which supports open membership. He argued that the society didn't provide valid reasons for denying membership.

"The society must record reasons for denial, as per the Act," Mr. Anturkar pointed out.

Court's Decision: Upholding the Society's Rejection

Justice Amit Borkar ruled in favor of Rashmi Co-operative Housing Society, bringing back the rejection of Bajaj's application from June 20, 2014. The court highlighted the need for a registered transfer document and following cooperative laws.

"The society's rejection is restored. Bajaj must produce a valid registered transfer," stated the judgment.

Summary of Verdict

The court decided that Romila Dilip Bajaj could try again by submitting proper documents within three months if she wants to pursue membership again. This case highlights the importance of having the right paperwork in cooperative society matters.

Tags:
Cooperative Housing
Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
Property Rights