Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court: Bail Denied for Alleged Drug Smuggler Syed Sameer Hussain

Updated
Sep 25, 2025 4:49 PM
News Image

Quick Summary: Syed Sameer Hussain's request to be released from jail while waiting for his trial was turned down by the Bombay High Court. He was involved in a drug smuggling case, where a large amount of cocaine was found. The court found enough proof against him to deny his request to be released.

The Case Begins: Cocaine at the Airport

On April 3, 2023, Imran Ahmed Mohammed was caught at Mumbai's airport with 1970 grams of cocaine. He said Syed Sameer Hussain was involved, who was arrested the next day at a hotel near the airport. Imran claimed he was working for Hussain, who managed travel and plans for the drug smuggling operations.

The Evidence: WhatsApp and More

The authorities found WhatsApp messages between Syed Sameer Hussain and others, including someone named Mr. Morris, who was believed to be leading the operation. Hussain's wife, Sakina, also admitted that her bank account was used for money transfers related to the drug activities.

"The Applicant revealed that he communicated with Mr. Morris through WhatsApp calls and chats."

The Legal Battle: Bail Application

Syed Sameer Hussain asked to be released from jail, arguing that he had been locked up for too long without being officially charged. His lawyer, Mr. Hrishikesh Mundargi, claimed there was no direct proof like money in Hussain's account or drugs found on him.

The Court's Decision: Bail Rejected

Judge Dr. Neela Gokhale noted that the evidence, including 117 calls between Syed Sameer Hussain and Imran Ahmed Mohammed, was strong. The court was not convinced that Hussain was innocent or that he wouldn't break the law again if released.

"There is material to suggest more than 117 calls of the Applicant to the Accused No.1."

Summary of the Verdict

The court decided that because the crime was very serious and there was a lot of proof against Syed Sameer Hussain, he should not be released from jail for now. The trial will continue, and the court's observations are not final judgments.