Quick Summary: In a case filled with accusations and responses, Mrs. N. Vedavalli's lawsuit against Ramyashri Natarajan was dismissed, while Natarajan's counterclaim was accepted, resulting in a large financial judgment.
Mrs. N. Vedavalli filed a lawsuit against Ramyashri Natarajan, claiming she was owed ₹50,00,000 plus interest. However, the case was dismissed because Vedavalli didn't show up in court. Judge C.V. Karthikeyan noted her absence and decided to dismiss the case.
After the dismissal, Natarajan filed a counterclaim. She said that Vedavalli tricked her into a business scheme involving the Central Excise Department. Natarajan claimed Vedavalli promised commissions from selling goods at discounted prices but never paid her share.
"The plaintiff collected ₹64.25 lakhs from customers in the presence of the defendant."
Natarajan presented evidence, including written promises to pay (promissory notes) and bounced checks from Vedavalli. The court looked at these documents, which supported Natarajan's claims. Vedavalli had issued promissory notes for ₹1.68 crores, but the checks bounced.
Natarajan had also filed a police complaint when the checks bounced. The case involved accusations of cheating and breaking trust, with a police report filed at Valasaravakkam Police Station.
"The defendant lodged a complaint with the Valasaravakkam Police Station, and a police report in Crime No.192 of 2010 had been registered."
Judge C.V. Karthikeyan ruled in favor of Natarajan, granting her the amount of ₹1.68 crores plus costs. The decision was based on the evidence presented and the lack of defense from Vedavalli.
This case highlights the importance of showing up in court and the consequences of legal agreements. It's a reminder that business deals should always be clear and well-documented.
