Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Businessman's Murder Conviction Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence

Updated
Feb 13, 2026 7:35 PM
bombay-hc-businessmans-murder-conviction-overturned-due-to-insufficient-evidence

Summary: Ashok Shankar Mhatre was initially found guilty of murder and sentenced to life in prison. However, the Bombay High Court has reversed this decision, citing insufficient evidence. Let's break down what happened.

The Initial Conviction

Ashok Shankar Mhatre, a 47-year-old businessman from Virar, was found guilty on May 5, 2012, by the Additional Sessions Judge in Vasai. He was sentenced to life in prison for murder and given an additional three years for hiding evidence. A fine was also imposed.

The Crime Scene Discovery

On January 10, 2010, a passerby named Prashant Raut found a dead body with a crushed face under a tree near National School in Virar. The police were informed, and an investigation began. The deceased was later identified as Kantabai by her parents.

Investigation and Arrest

The local crime branch took over the investigation. They traced phone calls from Kantabai's phone to Ashok Mhatre, leading to his arrest on January 31, 2010. The trial began in the Sessions Court, Vasai.

Witnesses and Evidence

Several witnesses were presented:

  • Prashant Raut: Found the body.
  • Ganesh Bahurupi: Witnessed evidence collection.
  • Prashant Shetye: Friend of Ashok, testified about Ashok's confession outside of court and the theory that Ashok was the last person seen with Kantabai.
  • Dr. Bansode: Conducted the postmortem, confirming death by strangulation.

Appeal and Overturning the Conviction

Ashok appealed the conviction, arguing that the case was based on evidence that was not strong. The defense highlighted:

  • Weak Evidence: The confession outside of court was not reliable.
  • Last Seen Theory: The time gap between Ashok and Kantabai's last sighting and her death was too wide.
  • Motive and Recovery: No clear evidence of motive or proper recovery of blood-stained clothes.

The Bombay High Court, with Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat, reviewed the evidence and found the chain of circumstances incomplete. On February 5, 2026, they found Ashok not guilty, stating the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Verdict Summary

The court's decision emphasizes the need for strong evidence in criminal cases. Ashok's acquittal shows that mere suspicion isn't enough for a conviction. The justice system requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt to uphold a conviction.