Summary: The Delhi High Court decided on November 27, 2025, that electricity connections can be given even if buildings are not approved. This decision aims to prevent electricity theft and ensure safety.
The case began when BSES Rajdhani Power Limited filed a complaint against Mr. Vinod Singh Negi and others. The issue was about a previous decision from March 8, 2024, by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) that allowed electricity connections despite unauthorized buildings.
The court noticed that electricity connections were already installed following earlier instructions. This was part of a larger issue in Delhi, where buildings without approval often faced delays in action due to legal protections and slow processes.
The court mentioned the National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2011, which protects certain buildings until December 31, 2026. This law often stops the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) from taking immediate action against unauthorized buildings.
"Though orders to tear down have been given, the unauthorized construction is protected by law."
The court highlighted the risk of electricity theft if connections are not provided. Without legal connections, residents might use illegal means, posing safety risks.
"Unauthorized use of electricity leads to cases of electricity theft, which should be stopped."
Justice Mini Pushkarna decided that electricity companies can provide connections to such properties. However, they must cut off the supply if the MCD takes action like sealing or tearing down the building.
"The electricity company can disconnect the electricity connection as soon as the MCD requests or directs them to do so."
The court instructed that electricity companies and the MCD should work together. When the MCD acts against unauthorized buildings, companies must disconnect electricity as instructed.
"Electricity companies shall fully cooperate with the MCD and take necessary action for disconnection at the time of sealing or demolition."
The court concluded the case by stating that electricity connections should stay until the MCD takes formal action. This decision tries to balance the need for following the law with practical safety concerns.
