Supreme Court

Supreme Court: Cement Corporation's Fire Claim Reassessed Despite Theft Link

Updated
Jan 9, 2026 7:12 PM
supreme-court-cement-corporations-fire-claim-reassessed-despite-theft-link

Quick Summary: Cement Corporation of India faced a setback when thieves accidentally started a fire during a break-in. Their insurance claim was initially turned down, but the Supreme Court has now decided to take another look at the situation.

The Initial Incident: A Fiery Theft

On November 1, 2006, a break-in at the Mandhar Cement Factory in Chhattisgarh turned into a disaster. Thieves using blow torches accidentally set a transformer on fire. This incident led to significant damage, and the Cement Corporation of India quickly filed a claim with ICICI Lombard General Insurance.

Insurance Claim Denied

ICICI Lombard General Insurance turned down the claim on January 4, 2008. They argued that the policy did not cover losses caused by theft, which they considered the main reason for the fire. This was based on the exclusion clause for Riots, Strike, Malicious, and Damage (RSMD).

Quote from Rejection Letter:
"The main cause of loss was Burglary... this risk is not covered under the policy (RSMD Exclusion Clause-D)."

The Legal Battle Begins

Unhappy with this decision, the Cement Corporation of India filed a complaint with the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in 2009. They demanded compensation of over Rs. 2.99 crore, arguing that the fire, not the theft, was the main cause of the damage.

NCDRC Sides with Insurance

In 2015, the NCDRC dismissed the complaint, agreeing with ICICI Lombard that the theft was the main cause of the fire. They relied on a previous court ruling that emphasized the importance of the "active and efficient cause."

Supreme Court Steps In

The Cement Corporation of India appealed to the Supreme Court, which reviewed the case. On December 16, 2025, Justice Vijay Bishnoi and Justice J.K. Maheshwari ruled in favor of the Cement Corporation of India. They stated that since the policy covered fire, the cause of the fire (theft) was irrelevant.

Court's Analysis:
"If the damage is caused by fire, then the reason by which the fire took place becomes irrelevant."

What’s Next?

The Supreme Court has sent the case back to the NCDRC to reassess the loss. They expect a decision within six months, potentially turning the tide in favor of the Cement Corporation of India.

Tags:
Insurance Law
Consumer Rights
Fire Damage