Bombay High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa: Diocesan Society's Right to Self-Manage Schools Upheld

Updated
Oct 9, 2025 12:40 PM
News Image

The High Court of Bombay at Goa recently decided in favor of the Diocesan Society of Education, allowing them to run their schools without interference from rules set by the state. This decision highlights the rights of minority groups to manage their own educational matters.

Background of the Case

The Diocesan Society of Education, led by Fr. Jesus Nazareth Rodrigues, filed two requests against certain rules under the Goa School Education Rules, 1986. They claimed these rules violated their rights as a minority group under Article 30 of the Indian Constitution, which lets minority groups start and run schools of their choice.

The Dispute Over Rule 46

The main issue was Rule 46, which set the rules for who can be on the school management committees and what powers they have. The Society argued that this rule gave the state too much control over hiring and discipline of school staff, which should be their decision.

"The Petitioner-Society, as a minority institution, has the right to run its schools," argued Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate for the Society.

Court's Decision

Justice Bharati Dangre and Justice Nivedita P. Mehta were the judges for the case. The court decided that while the state can have rules to keep educational standards, these should not take away the rights of minority groups to manage themselves.

Key Points from the Judgment

  • Managing Committees vs. Management: The court said that the Managing Committees of individual schools should handle daily tasks but must be under the control of the Society’s management.
  • Appointments and Disciplinary Actions: The Society can hire and discipline staff without needing the state’s approval, as long as they follow set qualifications and standards.
  • Circular Quashed: The court canceled a circular from June 2020 that went against the Society's right to run its schools.

"The insistence that appointment orders should be signed by the Managing Committee of the school is unjustified," the court stated.

Summary of the Verdict

The ruling supports the independence of minority groups in managing their schools. It shows the balance between state rules and the constitutional rights of minority communities to manage their own educational matters. The case is an important win for minority educational institutions in India.