Bombay High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa: Builder Ordered to Demolish Illegal Structures for Environmental Violations

Updated
Nov 13, 2025 12:40 PM
News Image

Quick Summary: The High Court of Bombay at Goa has stopped a building project by Tarun Radhakrishin Tahiliani because it broke environmental rules. The court ordered that the illegal buildings be torn down and the land be fixed back to how it was.

Background of the Case

This case involves two lawsuits against Tarun Radhakrishin Tahiliani and others. The people who filed the lawsuits, including Dhirendra Phadte and Peter Franco, said that the building activities broke environmental laws and local rules about how land can be used.

The Project in Question

Tahiliani's project planned to build homes, including a swimming pool, on land marked for "Settlement Zone" in Village Salvador-do-Mundo. The project got initial approval on March 2, 2023, but ran into trouble because of claims that the land was changed illegally and construction was not allowed.

Legal Arguments

The people against the project argued that it went against the Regional Plan 2021 and the Goa Town and Country Planning Act, 1974. They said the approvals were obtained dishonestly, without proper discussion, and broke environmental rules.

"The permissions granted are in violation of RPG-2021 and the Biological Diversity Act, 2000," the petitioners stated.

Court's Decision

Judges Bharati Dangre and Nivedita P. Mehta were in charge of the case. They found that the building was not allowed and ordered that the structures be torn down. The court stressed the importance of keeping the natural environment safe and following land use rules.

"In view of the violations, the construction license is quashed, and the land must be restored," the judgment declared.

Impact on the Environment

The court pointed out the need to protect nature and stop illegal building activities. The ruling requires the land to be returned to its original state, focusing on development that doesn't harm the environment.

Verdict Summary

The court's decision highlights the importance of following environmental rules and land use laws. It is a win for those who support protecting the environment and sets an example for future cases about land use and building in the area.