City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad: Unauthorized Building Case Requires Compliance with Court Orders

In a recent court decision, Judge B. Vijaysen Reddy dealt with the problem of unauthorized building in Hyderabad. Let's break down what happened and what it means for everyone involved.

Petitioner’s Complaint: Orders Ignored

The person who brought the case, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, represented by Mr. T. Damodar, was upset because Mr. Anil Sharma (respondent No.3) wasn't following a previous court order. This order, from the City Small Causes Court at Hyderabad, required them to issue a new notice about unauthorized building changes. Mr. Rajesh Kumar claimed that because this wasn't done, respondents Mrs. Kavita Reddy, Mr. Sunil Reddy, Mr. Prakash Reddy, Mrs. Anjali Reddy, Mr. Vikram Reddy, and Mr. Rohit Reddy (respondents Nos. 4 to 9) started their unauthorized building activities again.

"Mr. Anil Sharma is not acting upon the order... taking advantage, Mrs. Kavita Reddy, Mr. Sunil Reddy, Mr. Prakash Reddy, Mrs. Anjali Reddy, Mr. Vikram Reddy, and Mr. Rohit Reddy have started unauthorized construction."

Respondents’ Side: No Building Happening

Mr. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, the lawyer for Mr. Anil Sharma and Mr. Ramesh Verma (respondents Nos. 2 and 3), disagreed with Mr. Rajesh Kumar's claims. He said that no building was currently happening. He also provided a copy of a new notice dated November 3, 2025, showing that steps were being taken to follow the court's previous order.

Court’s Decision: Follow the Rules

Judge Reddy decided to close the case but made it clear that Mr. Anil Sharma must follow the earlier order from October 17, 2025. They need to finish the investigation based on the new notice and make sure no unauthorized building happens in the meantime.

"Mr. Anil Sharma is directed not to allow Mrs. Kavita Reddy, Mr. Sunil Reddy, Mr. Prakash Reddy, Mrs. Anjali Reddy, Mr. Vikram Reddy, and Mr. Rohit Reddy to build in a way that breaks the approved plan."

What’s Next: Time to Follow the Rules

The court has set a timeline for following the rules, and everyone needs to stick to it. Mr. Anil Sharma has to finish the investigation as per the notice, and until then, no building that breaks the rules can continue.

This decision shows how important it is to follow legal processes and make sure building activities follow the law. It’s a win for those who support legal development in the city.

"Disclaimer: The names used in this report are made up and have been added for privacy reasons."