A series of appeals about land payment in Vaijapur have been addressed by the Bombay High Court. The case is about disagreements over payment for land taken in 1986, with decisions announced on February 27, 2026.
Origins and Appeals
In 1986, land was taken in Vaijapur, leading to payment disagreements. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) originally said the lands were dry and offered a rate of ₹370 per R. No payment was given for wells or trees, causing unhappiness among landowners.
Group I: Dry vs. Irrigated Land
People appealing, including Zumberabai Jagannath Salunke, argued their lands were watered, deserving higher payment. The Reference Court initially rejected these claims, sticking to the original classification.
Group II: Additional Compensation
This group, also represented by Zumberabai Jagannath Salunke and others, wanted payment for buildings and trees, which the Reference Court also denied, saying the original decision was the limit.
Judge Shailesh P. Brahme's Ruling
The court found that those appealing could indeed receive payment more than the original decision. It emphasized that the law aims to ensure fair payment, especially for those unable to initially challenge the SLAO's decision.
"The appellants are entitled to receive rate of Rs. 1500/- per R for dry land or Rs. 3000/- per R for irrigated land."
Compensation Reassessment
The court ordered a new look at the appeals in Group II, focusing on extra payment for wells, buildings, and trees. It instructed the Reference Court to handle these matters quickly.
The decision shows the importance of fair payment and the court's role in fixing initial mistakes. It highlights the need for careful checking of land classification and extra payment factors in land acquisition cases.
