Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Ashok Gupta's Amendments in 1985 Property Case Approved

Updated
Jan 30, 2026 11:09 PM
bombay-hc-ashok-guptas-amendments-in-1985-property-case-approved

Summary: Ashok Gupta wanted to make changes to a legal case that started in 1985 about the property of Kundanlal Gupta. The Bombay High Court, led by Judge Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, allowed these changes on January 28, 2026, with some conditions.

Background of the Case

The case was first brought by Om Prakash Gupta and Savitri Devi in 1985, asking for decisions and financial details related to Kundanlal Gupta's property. After they passed away, Ashok Gupta took over the case.

Kundan Talkies Partnership

Kundanlal Gupta was a business partner in Kundan Talkies, a movie theater business in Bahadurgarh, Haryana. Arguments arose about the partnership agreement, leading to a different case in Bahadurgarh in 2010.

Bahadurgarh Case Developments

The Bahadurgarh court decided in favor of Raj Kumar Gupta on February 13, 2023. This decision was confirmed on appeal on August 14, 2024. These rulings dealt with issues about family connections and who had the right to the partnership.

Ashok Gupta's Changes

Ashok Gupta requested changes in the original case to include details and decisions from the Bahadurgarh case. The changes aimed to use the principles of decisions made in previous cases and preventing someone from arguing something contrary to what was established in an earlier case, suggesting these should affect the ongoing case in Bombay.

Court's Decision on Changes

  • First Part: Allowed changes to include results from the Bahadurgarh case, supporting the idea that the case had already been decided and preventing contradictory arguments.
  • Second Part: Allowed changes for claims of money owed and better details about the properties.
  • Third Part: Fixed a mistake in the requests made to the court.
  • Fourth Part: Not pursued by Ashok Gupta.

Judge Pooniwalla stressed a flexible approach to making changes, especially before the trial, allowing updates for a fair trial.

Verdict

The court approved the changes with a cost of Rs. 50,000 to be paid by Ashok Gupta to the other party. This decision highlights the importance of making sure ongoing cases reflect relevant findings from related cases.

Tags:
Property Rights
Partnership Disputes
Civil Procedure Code