Quick Summary: Vijay Kumar's request to have a court look into his property rights was turned down, and he's advised to go to a regular court for property rights.
Vijay Kumar Panuganti, with his lawyer's help, wanted to take back his request to the court. This decision was influenced by a previous ruling from another group of judges in a similar case from 2021.
The other side, represented by Ms. Keerti Kabra, questioned whether Vijay's request was even valid. This was an important point during the court discussions.
In a previous case (W.P.No.29616 of 2021), the court found that the document Vijay was questioning did not directly affect his property rights. They suggested he should go to a regular court to prove his rights.
"The petitioner should approach the competent Civil Court for declaration of his right and title over the subject property."
Based on these points, Judges Moushumi Bhattacharya and Gadi Praveen Kumar decided to turn down Vijay's request. However, they said he could still ask a regular court for help.
"Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the competent Civil Court to seek appropriate relief."
Interestingly, Vijay was not ordered to pay any court fees for this process.
This case highlights the importance of choosing the right legal path when dealing with property disputes.
