In a recent decision by Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy, a request made by Syed Safiulla Qadri and Syed Tajuddin was dismissed. They wanted the authorities to take action on their complaint about a property dispute in Hyderabad. Here's what happened.
Syed Safiulla Qadri and Syed Tajuddin were upset because the police refused to act on their complaint. They thought it was wrong and unfair for the police to dismiss their concerns by calling it a "civil matter."
The main issue was a disagreement over a property at House No.16-2-27, Akber Bagh, Malakpet, Hyderabad. The petitioners had already taken the matter to civil court and even got a temporary order to protect part of the property.
The police, represented by the State of Telangana, the Commissioner of Police, the Deputy Commissioner of Police, the Assistant Commissioner of Police, and the Station House Officer, argued that they had already registered a case based on the complaint. This was recorded as Crime No.261 of 2015 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code.
Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy concluded that since Syed Safiulla Qadri and Syed Tajuddin's issues had been addressed, there was no need for further legal action. Therefore, the writ petition was dismissed as unnecessary, meaning it was no longer relevant.
In summary, the court decided not to pursue the matter further because the existing legal processes had already addressed the concerns of Syed Safiulla Qadri and Syed Tajuddin.
