Telangana High Court: Petition on Police Inaction Declared Unnecessary

Summary: The court dismissed a request about the delay in filing charges for a case, saying it was no longer needed.

Background of the Case

In this case, Smt A Geetha Devi filed a request. She wanted the court to take action because the police hadn't filed charges related to Case No. 79/2016 at Narayanguda Police Station. She claimed this delay was illegal and violated her rights under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Court Hearing

Justice N. Tukaramji was in charge of the case. The petitioner's lawyer, Mr. G. Suresh Goud, argued that the delay was unfair. On the other side, Mr. R. Laxmikanth Reddy, the Assistant Government Lawyer for Home, represented the other side, including the State of Telangana and various police officials.

Petition Declared Unnecessary

During the hearing, Mr. Goud stated that the issue no longer needed a court decision. He asked the court to dismiss the request as "unnecessary," meaning it was no longer relevant. Mr. Reddy had no objections to this request.

"Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel, this Writ Petition is dismissed as unnecessary."

Conclusion of the Case

Justice N. Tukaramji dismissed the request, agreeing that it was no longer necessary to pursue. There were no costs ordered, and any pending additional requests were also closed.