Quick Summary:
In a recent court decision, Judge Moushumi Bhattacharya dismissed a civil revision petition involving a dispute over alleged forgery of signatures on an agreement. The person who brought the case, G N Uday Kumar, claimed his signatures were faked. However, the petition was ultimately withdrawn.
The case began with G N Uday Kumar, who was being sued by Adam Prem. The lawsuit was about the specific performance of an Agreement-Cum-Receipt dated June 15, 2017. Uday Kumar claimed that his signature on the agreement and a related cash receipt were faked. He argued that the signatures were copied using scanning technology.
"The petitioner’s signature on the Agreement-cum-Receipt and the Cash Receipt are forged and were electronically lifted by scanning."
The trial court, led by the main judge in Medchal-Malkajgiri District, dismissed Uday Kumar's request. He had asked for expert evidence to prove the alleged forgery. The court did not find enough reason to send the documents for expert analysis.
During the proceedings, Uday Kumar's lawyer, Mr. J. Govardhan Reddy, asked for permission to withdraw the civil revision petition. Judge Moushumi Bhattacharya agreed to this request, leading to the dismissal of CRP No.1581 of 2025. The case was closed without any orders regarding costs.
"Permission is granted, as prayed for. CRP.No.1581 of 2025 is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn."
With the withdrawal of the petition, the case has reached a temporary conclusion. The allegations of forgery remain unresolved in the court's eyes. The decision highlights the complexities involved in legal disputes over document authenticity and the challenges of proving forgery claims.
