Summary: In a recent court decision, Justice Tirumala Devi Eada refused to drop the case against Bhagavan Reddy and Suvarna Thippy Reddy, the in-laws of a woman who filed a complaint. The case will continue in the Kukatpally court.
Bhagavan Reddy and Suvarna Thippy Reddy, the in-laws of the complainant, wanted the court to stop the legal proceedings against them. Their lawyer, Mr. Jillela Rajeshwar Rao, argued that the accusations were not true. He noted that the complainant never lived with them and is currently staying at her parents' home. The main person accused, the complainant's husband, lives in the USA.
On the other side, the Additional Public Prosecutor, Sri Jitender Rao Veeramalla, disagreed with the request. He pointed out that there was a statement from an independent witness, known as LW-4, which backed up the accusations against Bhagavan Reddy and Suvarna Thippy Reddy. This statement was included in the official documents.
"The statement of the independent witness reveals the accusations against the petitioners."
After looking over the records, Justice Tirumala Devi Eada decided not to interfere with the ongoing legal process. The case will continue in the Kukatpally court under C.C.No.2140 of 2024. However, the judge allowed Bhagavan Reddy and Suvarna Thippy Reddy to skip court hearings unless their presence is specifically needed, as long as they have a lawyer to represent them.
"This Court is not inclined to interfere with the judicial process."
The court's decision means that the legal proceedings will go on, and Bhagavan Reddy and Suvarna Thippy Reddy will remain part of the case. The decision highlights the importance of the independent witness's statement in the ongoing legal proceedings.
