Here's a quick rundown of a recent court decision involving Parwez Khan and his family. The court made some important decisions about how much money should be paid for family support.
Parwez Khan and Shabnam Ara got married on June 22, 2018, in New Delhi. They have a daughter together. On July 16, 2024, the Family Court in Saket, New Delhi, decided that Parwez should pay ₹15,000 per month to both Shabnam and their daughter as temporary support. This decision was based on Shabnam's claim that she had no income and needed support for herself and her child.
"Parwez Khan to pay a sum of ₹15,000/- per month to Shabnam Ara and ₹15,000/- per month to their minor child."
Parwez Khan wasn't happy with this decision. He argued that Shabnam is well-educated, with a Master's degree in Business Administration, and could work to support herself. He also mentioned his financial obligations, like supporting his elderly parents and divorced sister.
Shabnam's side argued that she couldn't work due to health issues and had no independent income. They maintained that Parwez, who earns about ₹60,000 per month, should support his family.
The court looked into Parwez's claims, noting that his father receives a pension and isn't financially dependent on him. The court also pointed out that Parwez's sister could seek support from her former husband.
"The father of Parwez Khan is a retired government servant who is drawing a monthly pension of ₹17,000/-."
On December 10, 2025, the court decided to reduce the support for the child from ₹15,000 to ₹10,000 per month. However, the ₹15,000 per month for Shabnam remained unchanged. The court emphasized that personal loans and EMIs should not affect support calculations.
"The amount of ₹15,000/- per month awarded to Shabnam Ara is found to be just, reasonable, and commensurate with her medical condition."
The court decided to lower the money Parwez has to pay for his child each month from ₹15,000 to ₹10,000. The amount for Shabnam stayed the same at ₹15,000 per month. The court made it clear that Parwez's other financial responsibilities should not change the support he provides to his family.
