Summary: In a case filled with twists, the Delhi High Court has decided to start from scratch on a divorce battle between Suman Sankar Bhunia and Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty. The court found the previous judgment flawed and ordered a fresh trial.
The Case Background
This case began in the Family Court at Patiala House, New Delhi. The marriage of Suman Sankar Bhunia and Debarati Bhunia Chakraborty was ended on March 28, 2024, due to claims of mistreatment. The couple disagreed on the details of their marriage, with one saying it was according to Hindu customs and the other saying it was under the Special Marriage Act (SMA).
The Allegations and Legal Battles
- Claims of Mistreatment: Debarati said she faced physical and emotional abuse, which made her leave the home they shared in September 2018.
- Legal Struggles: The couple was involved in many legal cases, including those about child custody and domestic violence, in different courts across India.
Court's Concerns
- Errors in Process: The Family Court Judge was criticized for using rules that don't exist and not giving Debarati enough time to present her evidence.
- Mix-up of Laws: The judge confused the rules of the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) and the SMA, which have different rules for divorce.
The High Court's Decision
- Judgment Reversed: The High Court found the Family Court's decision unworkable because of mistakes in how the case was handled and the judge's overstepping.
- New Trial Ordered: The case is sent back for a new trial, giving both sides a fair chance to show their evidence.
- Judge Training: The judge involved must take training in marriage laws.
What's Next?
The parties are to appear before the Family Court in New Delhi on December 5, 2025, for a fresh start. This time, the court aims to ensure a fair trial with all evidence considered.
Key Takeaways
- Importance of Following Rules: The case shows how crucial it is to follow legal rules and guidelines.
- Higher Court's Role: The decision highlights how higher courts can fix mistakes and make sure justice is done.
In this ongoing case, the court's intervention aims to give both parties a fair chance to present their cases fully, ensuring justice is served.
