Delhi HIgh Court

Delhi HC: Director's Firm Implicated in Rs. 600 Lakh Loan Fraud

Updated
Mar 12, 2026 7:36 PM
delhi-hc-directors-firm-implicated-in-rs-600-lakh-loan-fraud

Quick Summary: Lalit Kumar's attempt to overturn his charges in a massive loan fraud case has been denied by the Delhi High Court. Judge Saurabh Banerjee upheld the charges, citing strong suspicion of Kumar's involvement in the fraudulent activities.

Background of the Case

In March 2013, a man named Sumit Mittal, pretending to be the owner of M/s. Shree Balaji Overseas, applied for a large loan of Rs. 600 lakhs from Corporation Bank in Delhi. The loan was approved on April 19, 2013, with stock and property as security. However, the property documents were later found to be fake.

The Fraud Uncovered

An internal investigation by the bank revealed that the loan was based on fake documents. The borrower and the company were not real, and the loan was approved against bank rules. The money was quickly moved out through various fake accounts.

"The loan amount was moved out within 20 days through accounts of various fake firms."

Lalit Kumar's Role

Lalit Kumar, a director at M/s. Kabir Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., was implicated when Rs. 87,50,166 was transferred to his company's account. The prosecution argued that Kumar's company was used as a channel for the fraudulent funds.

Court's Decision

Judge Saurabh Banerjee ruled that there was enough evidence to continue with the charges against Kumar. The court emphasized that the case needed further investigation due to the suspicious nature of the transactions.

"There is strong suspicion regarding his involvement in the alleged moving out of the loan money."

Arguments and Counterarguments

  • Defense: Kumar's lawyers argued that no direct evidence linked him to the fraud. They claimed that the company, not Kumar personally, received the funds.
  • Prosecution: The prosecution maintained that the fake nature of the borrower company indicated Kumar's active involvement in the fraud.

Verdict Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed Lalit Kumar's petition, reinforcing the charges against him. This decision highlights the complexities of financial fraud and the importance of thorough investigation.

Tags:
Financial Fraud
Evidence
Criminal Law