Delhi HIgh Court

Delhi HC: Allegations of Undisclosed Debts in Bhopal Election

Updated
Jan 7, 2026 7:14 PM
delhi-hc-allegations-of-undisclosed-debts-in-bhopal-election

Summary: The Delhi High Court, with Justice Jyoti Singh in charge, turned down a request to dismiss an election complaint against Arif Masood. The case involves claims of not being honest about money owed and unfair actions during the 2023 Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly elections.

Petition Filed and Initial Rejections

Dhruv Narayan Singh filed an election complaint against Arif Masood, challenging his election to the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from Bhopal. Singh claimed Masood didn't accurately report his financial debts. The election took place on November 17, 2023, and results were announced on December 3, 2023.

Masood's first try to get rid of the complaint was turned down by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on August 14, 2024. The Supreme Court later sent the case back for a new review.

Supreme Court's Involvement

On September 9, 2024, the Supreme Court told the High Court to check if two letters, which supposedly prove Masood didn't report his debts, were real. These letters were said to be from the State Bank of India, showing debts that weren't reported.

High Court Examination

The High Court looked at evidence from bank officials and decided the letters were real. Mr. Malviya, a former bank manager, confirmed he signed the letters, which listed Masood's debts.

Arguments by Dhruv Narayan Singh

Singh argued that Masood's failure to report big debts was unfair under the rules for fair elections. He also claimed Masood's nomination was accepted wrongly because of incorrect voter list paperwork.

Respondent's Defense

Masood argued that he and his wife were tricked by bank officials and a builder. He said the debts weren't his fault and that the letters were fake.

Court's Decision

Justice Jyoti Singh turned down Masood's request to dismiss the complaint, stating:

"The election petition cannot be dismissed in exercise of power under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as it raises triable issues."

The court found enough reason to move forward, saying a full trial is needed to figure out the truth about the claims of not reporting debts and fraud.

Additional Documents and Next Steps

Singh was allowed to bring in more documents, which supposedly show Masood's role in the loan process. The court will organize the issues and list witnesses on January 22, 2026.

Tags:
Election Law
Financial Misdeeds
Fairness in Elections