Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Nashik Bank Must Make Temporary Workers Permanent

Updated
Mar 16, 2026 11:51 AM
bombay-hc-nashik-bank-must-make-temporary-workers-permanent

In a recent decision, the Bombay High Court dealt with a long-standing issue involving temporary workers at the Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank. The court found that the bank treated workers unfairly by keeping them temporary for years, even though there was a need for permanent employees.

The Background: Temporary Workers Fight for Rights

This case involves several formal requests made by employees of the Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank. They argued that they were unfairly kept as temporary workers for over ten years, even though they were doing permanent and necessary jobs. The employees claimed they were denied benefits and permanent positions, which was against the rules set by the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

Court Proceedings: Unfair Labor Practices Uncovered

The Industrial Court initially dismissed the complaints on May 20, 2022, saying that the staffing plan hadn't been approved. However, the employees argued that they were hired for open positions and worked consistently without being let go. They were also treated unfairly, receiving fewer benefits than their permanent colleagues.

"The petitioners were appointed against vacant posts and possessed the requisite qualifications for such posts."

Bank's Defense: Staffing Pattern Approval Needed

The Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank argued that they couldn't make permanent appointments because the government hadn't approved their staffing plan. They admitted to having fewer permanent staff since 2005 and relied on temporary workers to keep things running.

"The Bank admitted that the work performed was perennial in nature."

Court's Decision: A Victory for the Petitioners

Judge Amit Borkar ruled in favor of Kiran Ambadas Ghuge and the other petitioners on March 5, 2026. The court recognized the bank's actions as unfair labor practices and ordered the bank to make the petitioners' jobs permanent. The bank must check each worker's eligibility and give them permanent positions and benefits.

"The respondent Bank is held to have engaged in unfair labor practices under Items 5 and 6 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act."

What This Means for Workers

This judgment is a big step for temporary workers seeking fair treatment and job security. The bank has been given twelve weeks to make the employees' jobs permanent, ensuring they receive the benefits they deserve.

This case shows how important fair labor practices are and the role of the courts in protecting workers' rights. It reminds employers of the consequences of ignoring employee welfare and legal responsibilities.

Tags:
Labor Rights
Unfair Labor Practices
Fair Treatment