Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Jay Anand Society's Split and Property Rights Orders Overturned

Updated
Feb 9, 2026 11:41 AM
bombay-hc-jay-anand-societys-split-and-property-rights-orders-overturned

Summary: The Bombay High Court handled a complicated case involving the Jay Anand Co-operative Housing Society and the State of Maharashtra. The court made decisions on issues related to splitting the society and property rights.

Background of the Case

The case involves the Jay Anand Co-operative Housing Society in Borivali, Mumbai. The society, with 22 members, faced legal challenges regarding its splitting and the transfer of property rights.

Key Events and Dates

  • November 3, 2018: An order was given to split the society, which was challenged.
  • November 5, 2020: An order was made to transfer part of the property rights, leading to more disputes.
  • September 28, 2021: The court ordered to keep things as they were regarding the property, which was reportedly ignored.

Arguments from Both Sides

  • Jay Anand Co-operative Housing Society's Stand: The society, represented by Mr. Pravin Samdhani, argued that the order to split was made without a proper hearing and broke the rules of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act (MCS Act). They also claimed that letting a new society form was wrongly allowed.

  • State of Maharashtra's Defense: Dr. Virag Tulzapurkar, representing the other side, argued that allowing the new society and splitting were legally right and that the society had no reason to challenge these orders.

Court's Findings

  • Exemption Order: The court found that allowing the new society to form was done without hearing the original society, which was unfair.

  • Splitting and Property Rights Orders: The splitting was considered wrong as it didn't meet the necessary legal rules. As a result, the order to transfer property rights was also canceled.

Verdict Summary

The court canceled the orders for splitting and transferring property rights, agreeing with the original society's arguments. This decision shows the importance of following the correct process and making sure everyone is heard in legal cases.

Final Note

The case was led by Justice R.I. Chagla, who emphasized following legal steps and respecting the rights of society members.

"No order that harms any society shall be made without giving that society a chance to present its case." - Justice R.I. Chagla

This case serves as a reminder of the complications involved in housing societies and the need for clear legal rules.