Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: ISON Builders' Agreement Terminated Due to Delays in Redevelopment Project

Updated
Jan 24, 2026 2:57 PM
bombay-hc-ison-builders-agreement-terminated-due-to-delays-in-redevelopment-project

Quick Summary: The Bombay High Court decided against ISON Builders LLP in a case about a redevelopment project in Mumbai. The court rejected ISON's request to stop the ending of their development agreement with Om Sai Ram Cooperative Housing Society.

Background of the Case

Development Agreement Issues

ISON Builders LLP was chosen as the developer for a redevelopment project on land owned by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) at Lower Parel, Mumbai. The deal was made on December 22, 2014, with the Om Sai Ram Cooperative Housing Society, which represents city tenants.

Ending the Agreement

On October 25, 2025, the society ended the development agreement because of delays and chose Aethon Developers Pvt. Ltd as the new developer. ISON Builders tried to stop this ending through legal action.

Key Events and Delays

Initial Steps and Delays

The project faced many delays. At first, ISON Builders didn't submit necessary financial documents, causing significant hold-ups. The Municipal Corporation sent letters in March and November 2021, asking ISON to prove its financial ability, which wasn't done until much later.

"The proposal of the scheme was submitted in 2015, and even after lapse of 6 years; the Annexure-2 also has not been issued."

COVID-19 and Further Delays

The COVID-19 pandemic further slowed progress. Despite this, the society and MCGM noted that ISON did not take enough steps to move the project forward.

Court's Decision

Judgment by Justice Sandeep V. Marne

On January 23, 2026, Justice Sandeep V. Marne decided against ISON Builders. The court found that the society and MCGM had good reasons to end the agreement because of the lack of progress and the developer's failure to meet their promises.

Appointment of Arbitrator

The court chose Smt. Justice Anjua Prabhudesai, a former judge, to handle disagreements between the parties.

Implications

Society's Right to Redevelop

The court stressed that the tenants' right to rebuild their old buildings was more important than the developer's right to make money. The judgment allows the society to continue with a new developer.

"The rights of a developer to earn profits through redevelopment contracts would always remain secondary to the rights of the society to have its building reconstructed."

Verdict Summary

The court's decision allows Om Sai Ram Cooperative Housing Society to move forward with their redevelopment plans with a new developer, emphasizing the importance of meeting contractual promises and timelines, especially for the benefit of residents living in old buildings.

Tags:
Property Rights
Development Agreements
Tenant Rights