Quick Summary: A court case involving a family property dispute in Warangal has taken a new turn. Judge Renuka Yara has allowed Smt. Burra Radhamma to be added as a defendant, changing a previous decision. This case revolves around who rightfully owns and can divide the family properties.
The main lawsuit was filed by Erukonda Brahmadevara Sridevi. She wants to divide and take possession of certain properties. These properties include dry land and a house in Chinthagattu Village, Warangal District. The dispute also involves getting rid of a previous decision from 1996.
The person who started the lawsuit, Erukonda Brahmadevara Sridevi, is the granddaughter of Erukonda Swamy. Swamy is the son of Erukonda Mankaiah, whose property is the main issue here. Other people involved include Swamy’s children and grandchildren.
Smt. Burra Radhamma, who says she is Mankaiah's daughter, asked to be added as a defendant. She says she is in possession of the disputed property.
Radhamma thinks that she was left out of the original case on purpose. She claims that the property was owned only by her father, Mankaiah, and has since been passed on to her. Radhamma argues that the other parties are trying to take away what is rightfully hers.
"The property was exclusive to Late Erukonda Mankaiah, and I, as his daughter, have inherited it," says Radhamma.
Judge Renuka Yara looked over the case details and found that Radhamma's connection to Mankaiah was backed by several other defendants. Even though she didn't have all the documents, the court saw enough initial evidence to suggest Radhamma's claim might be true.
The court stated:
"There is enough initial evidence that Radhamma is the daughter of Late Mankaiah, making her an important part of the case."
Adding Radhamma as a defendant is important to make sure that all possible claims to the property are considered. This decision aims to prevent any unfair advantage and ensure a fair trial.
The case will continue with Radhamma now officially involved as defendant No.31. Including her aims to bring all important facts to light and ensure a fair resolution to the family property dispute.
The court's decision highlights the importance of including everyone involved in legal disputes, especially in complicated family matters.
