Quick Summary: The court dismissed an appeal because Muthusamy and his co-appellants didn't show up. This case was about reversing a previous judgment, but without their appearance, the court couldn't proceed.
In this case, Muthusamy, along with Kaliyaperumal and Elavarasan, appealed a decision made by the Additional Subordinate Judge in Vridhachalam. They wanted to overturn a judgment from 2007 related to a lawsuit identified as O.S.No.153 of 1997. This appeal was officially filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC).
On September 17, 2025, the court called for the appellants, but they didn't show up. The case was then scheduled again for September 23, 2025. Unfortunately, the appellants were absent once more. Due to their no-show, the court had to dismiss the appeal.
"This appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution." - Justice Dr. A.D. Maria Clete
Justice Dr. A.D. Maria Clete decided to dismiss the appeal because Muthusamy and his co-appellants didn't appear in court. As a result, the related requests were also closed, and no costs were assigned. This means the court didn't require anyone to pay for the legal proceedings.
With the appeal dismissed, the previous judgment from 2007 remains in effect. Muthusamy, Kaliyaperumal, and Elavarasan missed their chance to challenge it, and the court proceedings are now closed.