In a recent court decision, Judge T. Madhavi Devi ruled in favor of Durgam Prakash, a ration dealer, whose shop was given to another dealer without following the correct steps. Let’s break down what happened.
Durgam Prakash, who runs a fair price shop, was in a difficult situation when his shop was suddenly given to D. Ramesh, another dealer. This decision was made by the authorities based on a notice dated September 11, 2025, without waiting for Prakash's side of the story.
"The proceedings were initiated without giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner."
Prakash argued that any differences in the stock were due to a broken weighing machine. He explained himself within the required three days, saying that the e-POS machine had a problem showing the weight, which was fixed by replacing the load.
The State of Telangana argued there was a difference of 17 quintals of rice, leading to a notice asking for an explanation. They started proceedings under a rule that allows taking goods if there's a violation.
Judge T. Madhavi Devi found that the authorities acted too quickly. They didn’t consider Prakash’s explanation before making their decision. The court noted that there was no formal suspension of Prakash’s dealership.
"The impugned order is passed without considering the explanation of the petitioner."
The court decided to reverse the decision, allowing Prakash to continue running his shop. The authorities were instructed to keep supplying essential goods to him for distribution.
The court made it clear that the ongoing proceedings can continue, but they must consider Prakash’s explanation and any documents he provides.
This case highlights the importance of fair procedure and the right to be heard. Justice T. Madhavi Devi’s decision ensures that due process is followed, safeguarding the rights of individuals like Durgam Prakash.
