Quick Summary: The court threw out a civil revision petition because the petitioner, Smt Venkatamma, didn't attend the hearing. Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda was in charge. Without anyone to speak for her, the case couldn't continue.
On October 16, 2025, the court called the case for a hearing. Unfortunately, nobody appeared to represent the petitioner, Smt Venkatamma. Because of this, the court decided to put the case in the "For Dismissal" category.
The court allowed for the case to be heard both online and in person. To be fair, the court decided to wait until the afternoon session. But once again, no one showed up for Smt Venkatamma.
"The court was ready to hear the case, but the petitioner didn't show up," explained Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda.
Since no one was there to represent the petitioner, the court had no choice but to dismiss the case for non-prosecution. This means the case was closed because the petitioner didn't follow through.
Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda decided that there would be no order for costs. This means neither side has to pay for the court's time.
Because the case was dismissed, any pending applications, like IA No.4 of 2022, were also closed. This ties up any loose ends related to this case.
In this case, the court dismissed the petition because the petitioner didn't show up to present her side.
