When a case no longer matters, it can be dismissed as "unnecessary." This is what happened in the case of Mohd Abdul Subhan Siddique versus the Government of Telangana and others. Let’s break down what happened.
In this case, the person who brought the issue to court was Mohd Abdul Subhan Siddique from Hyderabad. The people or groups he was up against included the Government of Telangana, the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, and the Assistant City Planner of Circle 4, GHMC Hyderabad.
The case was presented to Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty. When the court looked into it, Mohd Abdul Subhan Siddique's lawyer told the judge that the issue no longer needed a decision. This means the problem was either solved or no longer mattered.
"The cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous."
After listening to Mohd Abdul Subhan Siddique's lawyer, Justice Alishetty decided to dismiss the case. Since the issue was no longer active, there was no need for the court to make a decision on it.
"The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs."
Any other requests related to this case were also closed. This means everything connected to the main issue in this case was finished.
In summary, the court decided to dismiss the case because the problem was already taken care of or didn't matter anymore. This shows that sometimes, issues get solved even before a judge needs to make a decision.
