Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court: Private Hospitals Must Display Fees and Emergency Preparedness

Updated
Dec 16, 2025 11:00 AM
kerala-high-court-private-hospitals-must-display-fees-and-emergency-preparedness

On November 26, 2025, the Kerala High Court in Ernakulam made an important decision about the Kerala Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2018. Justices Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Syam Kumar V.M. rejected arguments against the Act, confirming its importance and legality.

The Case in Simple Terms

The case involved two appeals against the rules of the Act, which are meant to oversee hospitals and clinics in Kerala. Groups like the Kerala Private Hospitals Association and the Indian Medical Association argued that the Act's rules were not practical and went against the Constitution.

Concerns from the Appellants

  • Detailed Information Requirements: The groups argued that asking for detailed information about staff and services was unnecessary and invaded privacy.

  • Displaying Fees and Package Rates: They claimed that showing prices for different services was hard because medical care changes often.

  • Emergency Treatment Rules: Smaller clinics said they didn't have enough resources to meet the emergency care requirements.

Government’s Position

The State Attorney supported the Act, highlighting its role in improving public health and patient safety. The Act aims to make healthcare services transparent, accountable, and ethical.

"The regulation of clinical establishments aims to reduce medical mistakes, enforce basic standards, and ensure that healthcare facilities can handle emergencies properly."

Important Parts of the Act

  • Registration and Standards: All hospitals and clinics must register and follow set standards.

  • Transparency: Facilities must openly display the prices for services and packages.

  • Emergency Care: Clinics must provide necessary emergency treatment, even if the patient cannot pay immediately.

Court’s Decision

The court confirmed the Act, stating it was clear and fair. The judges stressed that the Act matches international standards and benefits the public by ensuring quality healthcare.

Guidelines Issued

The court also provided guidelines for effective implementation: - Emergency Care: Clinics must give initial life-saving help without needing upfront payment.

  • Transparency: Prices and services must be clearly shown in both Malayalam and English.

  • Handling Complaints: A strong system for dealing with patient complaints must be established.

Summary of the Verdict

The court's decision supports the Act, reinforcing the need for transparency, accountability, and patient rights in healthcare facilities. By confirming the Act, the court has emphasized the importance of fair and ethical medical care.