Quick Summary: A request was made to the court about a property dispute. The court found no interference and dismissed the request.
In this case, a request (No. 33118 of 2025) was filed because Anjali Mehta thought Raghav Sharma was interfering in her property matters, supposedly encouraged by Priya Verma and Suresh Patel.
Justice T. Madhavi Devi was in charge of the case. The court noted that the request was urgent, showing how important the situation was to Anjali Mehta.
The lawyer for Raghav Sharma explained that there was a disagreement between Anjali Mehta and Priya Verma and Suresh Patel. However, Raghav Sharma was not involved in the issue and was not interfering with Anjali Mehta’s property.
"Raghav Sharma is in no way concerned with the same nor is he interfering with the possession of Anjali Mehta over the subject property."
After hearing this explanation, the court decided that any disagreement between Anjali Mehta and Priya Verma and Suresh Patel should be resolved in the right place. Since Raghav Sharma was not interfering, the court decided not to get involved at this point.
The request was closed early, with no mention of any costs involved. Any other pending requests related to this were also closed.
"Since there is no interference by Raghav Sharma, this Court is not inclined to interfere in this matter at this stage."
Justice T. Madhavi Devi finalized the order on October 31, 2025, with instructions to provide an official copy by November 3, 2025.
"Disclaimer: The names used in this report are fictitious and have been added for privacy reasons."
