Delhi HIgh Court

Delhi HC: Inmate's Furlough Denied Due to Late Return and Intoxication

Updated
Feb 11, 2026 11:42 AM
delhi-hc-inmates-furlough-denied-due-to-late-return-and-intoxication

Summary: Mahipal's request for a temporary release from jail was rejected because of past bad behavior, including coming back late and being under the influence. The court ruled he can ask again after February 19, 2026.

The Case Background

On January 28, 2026, the High Court of Delhi made a decision about Mahipal, also known as Lala, who wanted a temporary release from jail. He was involved in a case under FIR No. 881/2014 for breaking laws related to the POCSO Act and making threats.

Why Was the Furlough Denied?

The request was first denied on December 10, 2025. The reasons were: - Late Return: Mahipal came back one day late from a previous temporary release. - Intoxication Incident: On February 19, 2025, he tested positive for substances found in certain syrups.

"The petitioner surrendered after completion of earlier furlough with a delay of one day."

Misconduct and Punishment

Mahipal's lawyer argued that the late return was a mistake in counting days. Although he was punished for these incidents, the court noted that denying temporary release again would be unfair.

"Denying him furlough would be double jeopardy."

Future Steps

Justice Girish Kathpalia concluded that Mahipal could reapply for temporary release after February 19, 2026, when the effects of his punishments would be over. The court told the authorities to treat his current request as a new application.

"The present petition is disposed of, directing the State of NCT of Delhi to treat the present petition as fresh application for furlough."

Summary of the Verdict

This case shows how important it is for inmates to behave well if they want to get temporary release from jail. Mahipal's case will be looked at again after February 19, 2026, and if a decision isn't made within four weeks, he can submit a new request to the court.