Quick Summary: On December 25, 2025, the Delhi High Court dismissed requests by Dinesh Kumar Pandey against M/S Singh Finlease Pvt. Ltd. The case was about bounced checks related to loans, with Pandey arguing he wasn't responsible because he had quit the companies involved.
Dinesh Kumar Pandey, who used to be a director of two companies, faced legal trouble from M/S Singh Finlease Pvt. Ltd., a company that lends money but isn't a bank. The lending company said that Pandey's companies didn't pay back loans, and the checks given for repayment bounced because there wasn't enough money in the account.
Dinesh Kumar Pandey argued he shouldn't be blamed for the bounced checks because he had quit the companies before the checks were written and bounced. He showed official forms and other company records to back up his claims of quitting.
The lending company argued that Dinesh Kumar Pandey was still involved in getting the loans and signing the checks. They doubted the timing of his quitting, suggesting it was a way to avoid being held responsible.
Justice Sanjeev Narula pointed out that the case had facts that needed to be looked at in a full trial. The court stressed that Pandey quitting didn't free him from being responsible for things done while he was still a director.
The court decided not to stop the legal process, meaning the trial will go on. Dinesh Kumar Pandey's requests were turned down, and he was told to defend himself during the trial.
