In a twist, the Delhi High Court has decided to send Rahul's case back to the trial court for a fresh look at the charges. Let's break down what happened.
Rahul was accused of being involved in a robbery that took place on February 17, 2022. The incident occurred when the complainant, along with Rahul, who was his driver, was traveling from Preet Vihar to Dilshad Garden in Delhi. Near the Yamuna Sports Complex, Rahul stopped the car, claiming a flat tire. Suddenly, two unknown men entered the car, snatched the complainant's phone, and threatened him with something that looked like a gun.
The decision was made on October 29, 2025, and announced on December 10, 2025. There was a significant delay of 398 days in filing the request to review the charges. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma decided to excuse this delay, noting that it was understandable due to the confusion over the charges.
Initially, the trial court's order on May 10, 2023, didn't seem to hold Rahul accountable under the law that applies when a weapon is used during a robbery because he didn’t use a weapon. However, on May 30, 2024, charges were made against him, including planning the crime and robbery under various laws.
"It is a settled proposition of law that an offence under this section can be applied only against the person who used any deadly weapon at the time of committing robbery." - Trial Court
Justice Sharma found contradictions in the trial court's decision. The trial court said Rahul didn't use a weapon, yet charged him under the section that applies when a weapon is used. Also, the required approval under the Arms Act was missing, making the charges questionable.
The High Court has asked the trial court to reconsider the charges after getting additional reports and approvals. Both sides will present fresh arguments, ensuring the decision is made based on complete information.
"The present matter deserves to be sent back to the learned Trial Court for passing a fresh order on charge." - Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma
This case highlights the importance of clear and consistent legal proceedings.
The High Court has sent the case back to the trial court to review the charges against Rahul, due to inconsistencies in the initial decision and missing approvals related to the use of weapons.
