Quick Summary: On December 10, 2025, Judge Girish Kathpalia of the Delhi High Court made an important decision in the case between Bull Value Incorporated VCC Sub-Fund and Delphi World Money Ltd. The court looked into claims of unfairness and mistakes in the process, ultimately deciding to send the case back to the original court.
The story began when Bull Value Incorporated VCC Sub-Fund filed a business-related lawsuit on November 15, 2025. Just two days later, the judge stepped down from the case. By November 19, Delphi World Money Ltd tried to move the case to another court but changed their mind and took back their request.
On November 27, 2025, the Principal District & Sessions Judge rejected Delphi World Money Ltd's request to move the case but told the business court to decide on the order of the applications. Despite this, the court told both parties to keep things as they are until December 1, 2025.
"The business court partly listened to the lawyer for Bull Value Incorporated VCC Sub-Fund on their request under Order VII Rule 10 CPC."
Delphi World Money Ltd made another attempt to move the case on November 28, 2025. They claimed unfairness because the business court didn’t fully record an order and asked to keep things as they are. The Principal District & Sessions Judge allowed this move, which Bull Value Incorporated VCC Sub-Fund opposed.
A surprising claim emerged that a court officer logged into a High Court video link on November 21, 2025, causing concern. This incident was noted as a serious claim against the court officer.
Judge Girish Kathpalia noted the complexities and decided to pause the challenged order. On December 10, 2025, the case was sent back to the court of Sh. Rakesh Pandit at Dwarka Courts, Delhi, with both parties set to appear on December 12, 2025.
"The current request may be allowed, canceling the challenged order and sending the case back."
The request was allowed, and all pending applications were resolved. The decision emphasized the importance of fair trial procedures and maintaining honesty in the judicial process.
A summary of the verdict: The court decided to send the case back to the original court to ensure a fair trial and address any claims of unfairness and mistakes in the process.
