Bombay High Court: Subhash Hiraman Jandhade Wins Land Division Dispute

Here's a breakdown of a court case that spanned over seven decades, involving land division in Nashik. Let's dive into the details.

The Long Road to Resolution

This case revolves around a land division dispute that began in 1949. Late Ragho, the common ancestor, had four sons who started a lawsuit for dividing and separately owning lands in Nashik. The legal journey has been long and complicated, with the latest decision delivered on November 4, 2025.

Key Players and Requests

• Subhash Hiraman Jandhade: One of the people who filed a request in the case.
• M/s. Thakker Developers: Another important party claiming land ownership.
• State of Maharashtra: The opposing side in the case.

Various requests were filed challenging different decisions related to land division and ownership.

The Core of the Dispute

The main issue was carrying out a decision to divide lands with Survey Nos. 80/3 and 867. The original decision in 1951 gave ownership to the people who filed the lawsuit, but carrying it out faced legal challenges and appeals over the years.

Court's Decision

The High Court, under Justice N.J. Jamadar, delivered a decision addressing the legality of the previous decisions and carrying out the division:

"The challenged orders do not affect giving possession of Survey No.80/3 to the Plaintiffs or their successors in interest."

Key Points of the Decision

• Survey No. 80/3: The court confirmed that this land should be given to the plaintiffs as per the original decision, and any orders affecting this were canceled.
• Survey Nos. 867/1 and 867/2: The court instructed the Collector to divide these lands according to the decision.

The Role of the Minister

The Revenue Minister's decision in 2024 was challenged as it allegedly changed the terms of the original agreement. The court found that the minister's order was wrong regarding Survey No. 80/3.

Summary of the Verdict

The court's decision clarifies the rightful ownership of the land, ensuring that the original decision is followed. This brings a long-standing legal battle to a close, finally resolving the dispute over land ownership.