Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Nashik Bank Ordered to Permanently Hire Long-Term Temporary Workers

Updated
Mar 12, 2026 11:27 AM
bombay-hc-nashik-bank-ordered-to-permanently-hire-long-term-temporary-workers

In an important decision, the Bombay High Court decided in favor of Smt. Sonali Vikram Shirke and others, who were working temporarily at the Nashik District Central Cooperative Bank. The court found that the bank treated employees unfairly by keeping them as temporary workers for years even though there were permanent jobs available.

Background of the Case

The case involves several complaints filed by employees of the Nashik District Central Cooperative Bank. These employees argued that they were kept as temporary workers even though they did necessary and regular work for the bank. They said this practice denied them the benefits and security of permanent jobs.

The Employees' Argument

Smt. Sonali Vikram Shirke and the other workers were hired as clerks and peons over ten years ago. They claimed:

  • They were hired to fill empty positions and did regular work.
  • Despite working for a long time, they were not given permanent status and the benefits that come with it.
  • They were paid less and given fewer benefits compared to permanent workers.

The employees pointed out that they were always doing important work, yet they were still called temporary.

"The petitioners were deliberately kept as temporary workers to prevent them from getting the benefits and privileges of permanent jobs."

Bank's Defense

The Nashik District Central Cooperative Bank, through its Chief Executive Officer, argued:

  • They hadn't gotten approval for the number of staff they needed, which stopped them from making permanent hires.
  • Temporary hires were necessary to keep the bank running because they were short on staff.
  • They said they couldn't make employees permanent without government approval.

Court's Findings

Justice Amit Borkar, who handled the case, found that:

  • The bank did treat employees unfairly by keeping them temporary even though permanent roles were needed.
  • There was no law stopping the bank from making these employees permanent.
  • The bank's own statements showed they needed more staff, which went against their claim for keeping workers temporary.

Court's Decision

  • The court canceled the previous decision by the Industrial Court dated May 20, 2022.
  • The bank was ordered to give Smt. Sonali Vikram Shirke and the other workers permanent status within twelve weeks.
  • Eligible workers will receive permanent status with continuous service and the benefits they deserve.

"The respondent Bank is found to have engaged in unfair labor practices under Items 5 and 6 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act."

Summary of Verdict

The court's decision is a big win for Smt. Sonali Vikram Shirke and the other workers, ensuring they get the job security and benefits that come with permanent employment. The court's ruling highlights the importance of treating workers fairly and following rules for hiring staff.

Tags:
Employment Law
Labor Rights
Unfair Labor Practices