Bombay High Court

Bombay HC: Employee Claims Voided Post-Resolution Plan

Updated
Jan 14, 2026 3:05 PM
bombay-hc-employee-claims-voided-post-resolution-plan

Quick Summary: In a legal battle between Metalyst Forgings Ltd. and Sanjay Ambadas Kulkarni, the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad decided on the validity of employee claims after the company's financial issues were resolved. The court decided that claims not included in the resolution plan are canceled, affecting the rehiring and payment of employees.

The Players: Metalyst Forgings and Employees

Metalyst Forgings Ltd., located in Aurangabad, faced several legal challenges from employees like Sanjay Ambadas Kulkarni. The company, now under new management, argued against rehiring employees who were let go during financial troubles.

The Background: Financial Troubles and Disputes

The issue started when Metalyst Forgings couldn't pay back loans, leading to financial trouble under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in 2016. Employees, including Kulkarni, were let go, leading to arguments over unfair dismissals.

"The dismissal dated 15.04.2019 is in complete violation of required rules," argued the employees.

The Legal Tangle: Tribunals and Halts

The Industrial Tribunal in Aurangabad initially dealt with the employee complaints. However, during the financial trouble process, a pause was in place, stopping actions against the company.

Key Dates: Timeline of Events

  • 15.12.2017: NCLT started the financial trouble process.
  • 14.05.2024: NCLT approved the resolution plan.
  • 02.07.2025: Labour Court dismissed employee claims for rehiring.
  • 12.01.2026: High Court gave its decision.

The Resolution Plan: Starting Fresh

Metalyst's new management argued that the resolution plan approved by the NCLT allowed them to start fresh, freeing them from past debts, including employee claims.

"All claims which are not part of the resolution plan shall stand canceled," ruled the court.

The Court's Decision: No Rehiring

Judge Arun R. Pedneker decided that after the resolution, Metalyst was not responsible for past claims. The court canceled previous orders for employee rehiring, emphasizing the importance of the IBC over other laws like the Industrial Disputes Act.

Summary of the Verdict

The court's decision highlights the power of the IBC in canceling other claims after a resolution. For employees like Kulkarni, it means their fight for rehiring and back pay ends here, setting an example for similar cases.

Tags:
Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Unfair Labor Practices
Employment Law