In a recent decision, the court dismissed a writ petition because it no longer needed to be decided. Here's what happened.
The case involved a person named Kasu Sayanna from Bhainsa, Adilabad District. He filed a writ petition against the Depot Manager of APSRTC in Adilabad District. The details of the dispute aren't clear from the documents, but it reached the court for a decision.
Judge Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao heard the case. The petitioner's lawyer, Sri Kiran Kumar, represented by Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, informed the court that the issue no longer needed a decision. Because of this, the court dismissed the case as "no longer needed," meaning it was no longer relevant or necessary to continue.
"The cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication."
In simple terms, when a case is labeled as "infructuous," it means the issue at hand has already been resolved or is no longer applicable, so there's no point in continuing the legal proceedings.
Judge Rao also decided that there would be no order regarding costs. This means neither party has to pay the other's legal fees.
Any miscellaneous petitions related to this case were also closed. This wraps up all pending matters related to this writ petition.
