In a recent court decision, Judge Narsing Rao Nandikonda dismissed a civil revision petition because it was considered "infructuous." Let's break down what that means and why it happened.
The case in question was a Civil Revision Petition numbered 7098 of 2018. When the hearing began, the lawyer for the person who filed the petition, Sri J.U.M.V. Prasad, stated that there was no longer a need to continue with the case. This means that whatever issue the petition was about had already been resolved or was no longer relevant.
The term "infructuous" might sound a bit tricky, but it simply means that the case doesn't need to be decided anymore. In this situation, the court decided there was no point in continuing with the case because the original issue was no longer a problem.
"The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs."
Judge Narsing Rao Nandikonda officially dismissed the petition. Since the case was no longer needed, the court also decided that there would be no costs awarded. This means neither side has to pay the other's legal fees.
Any other related applications that might have been pending were also closed. This means everything related to this case is now finished.
Summary: The civil revision petition was dismissed because the issue it was about was no longer a problem. No legal fees were awarded to either side, and all related applications were closed.
Disclaimer: The names used in this report are fictitious and have been added for privacy reasons.
