Here's the scoop: Two guys, Chandupatla Dasharatha Ramireddy and Keesari Prabhakar Reddy, asked the court to drop some charges against them. They were in trouble over a land dispute with Sadanandham Thangalapalli. But the court didn't agree.
Chandupatla and Keesari were accused of some serious stuff under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The charges included Sections 329(3), 324(4), and 351(2), which are pretty serious. They wanted the court to stop the case because they said it was just about land ownership, not a crime.
Their lawyer, Sri P.L. Rao, argued that the whole thing was just a disagreement over land. He claimed that Sadanandham was making false accusations because of a grudge over land boundaries. Basically, he said, "This is just a land fight, not a crime!"
The State of Telangana, represented by Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, wasn't convinced. They said the charges were real and there were clear accusations of trespassing and damaging property. They believed the case had enough evidence to go to trial.
Justice Tirumala Devi Eada looked at the case and decided not to get involved. She mentioned a previous case, Kathyayini v. Sidharth P.S. Reddy, to say that just because there's a civil case doesn't mean the criminal charges should be dropped.
"The accusations do show that Chandupatla and Keesari have entered the land without permission... and damaged the poles on the boundary."
The court said the case should continue in the trial court. However, Chandupatla and Keesari don't have to show up every time unless specifically needed. Their lawyer can represent them.
"The petition is disposed of directing the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Parkal, to dispose of C.C.No.172 of 2025 at the earliest."
So, the case will go on, and we'll have to wait and see what happens next in this land dispute.
