Nagarkurnool Court: Yaparla Family's Land Dispute Request Denied Due to Insufficient Evidence

Summary

A family argument over where land boundaries are in Nagarkurnool ends with the court saying no to stopping any action. Judge Renuka Yara agreed with earlier decisions, saying the family asking for help didn't have enough evidence.

The Dispute Over Land Boundaries

The case is about the Yaparla family from Jupally village, Charakonda Mandal, who wanted the court to stop the other family from taking their land. Yaparla Mohan Reddy and other family members said they owned certain lands and accused the Jabbu family of trying to take their land.

"The family said they owned the lands and had proof in the records."

Respondents' Stand

The Jabbu family, who also live in Nagarkurnool, said their land was next to the Yaparla family's land and denied trying to take anything. They said the Yaparla family was using their connections to cause trouble.

"The Jabbu family said the Yaparla family was trying to take land using their connections."

Court's Findings

Both the first court and the second court said no to the Yaparla family's request. They found mistakes in the Yaparla family's claims about where the land boundaries were, especially about a road that was supposed to divide the properties.

"The courts said the southern boundary shown by the Yaparla family was wrong."

Petitioners' Arguments

The Yaparla family argued that the courts used old or wrong maps. They said a document from 2021, which they didn't show in time, could prove they were right.

"The Yaparla family said there was a mistake in the maps and wanted to show new evidence."

Respondents' Counterarguments

The Jabbu family said the Yaparla family didn't show the important document earlier. They argued that the Yaparla family showed wrong boundaries to claim more land.

"The Jabbu family said the Yaparla family had no reason to stop them."

Justice Renuka Yara's Decision

Judge Yara agreed with the lower courts' decisions, which were based on the evidence they had. She dismissed the Yaparla family's request, saying they didn't provide the needed documents in time.

"Judge Yara said the Yaparla family didn't give the document when it was needed."

Verdict Summary

The Yaparla family's request to temporarily stop the other family was denied because of mistakes in their claims and not providing important evidence on time. The court highlighted how important it is to submit documents when they are needed.