Madras High Court

Madras High Court: Temple's Rent Claim Moot After Land Sale to Corporation

Updated
Sep 29, 2025 5:56 PM
News Image

Summary: Shri Prasanna Venkatesa Perumal Devasthanam filed a case against the Greater Chennai Corporation for unpaid rent. However, the case was closed after the temple sold the land to the corporation.

Background: Temple vs. Corporation

Shri Prasanna Venkatesa Perumal Devasthanam, represented by Managing Trustee Mr. J. Murali, took legal action against the Greater Chennai Corporation. The temple wanted the corporation to pay rent for using its land in West Mambalam, Chennai.

The Main Players

The case involved several key figures: - Petitioner: Shri Prasanna Venkatesa Perumal Devasthanam - Respondent: The Commissioner of Greater Chennai Corporation and others - Judge: The Honourable Mr. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh

The Legal Request

Shri Prasanna Venkatesa Perumal Devasthanam filed a request under a part of the Indian Constitution that deals with people's rights. They asked for an official order to make the corporation pay monthly rent for using their land at Survey No. 204/1 in Mettupalayam.

The Game Changer: Sale Deed

When the court looked into the matter, Shri Prasanna Venkatesa Perumal Devasthanam had already sold the land to the Chennai Corporation. A sale document dated September 3, 2025, was shown, confirming the deal. This meant the issue of unpaid rent was no longer important.

Court's Decision

Justice N. Anand Venkatesh noted the sale and closed the case. With the land sold, Shri Prasanna Venkatesa Perumal Devasthanam no longer had a claim for rent.

The sale of the land resolved the conflict, ending the need for further court involvement.