Madras High Court

Madras High Court: Chellappan's Property Claim Over Brother's Estate Denied

Updated
Dec 10, 2025 7:11 PM
madras-high-court-chellappans-property-claim-over-brothers-estate-denied

Summary: Chellappan's attempt to claim property from his late brother's estate was turned down by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. The court confirmed that the will giving the property to Manickavasagam's children was valid.

Background of the Case

Chellappan tried three times to change a decision made in 2018. He wanted a part of the properties owned by his late brother, Manickavasagam Pillai, saying they were family properties that should be shared. These properties included land and buildings in Madurai, where Chellappan had a business.

The Business Story

Chellappan and Manickavasagam started a wood business in 1972. Chellappan took care of a branch in Thirunagar, while Manickavasagam ran the main business in Thirumangalam. Chellappan claimed that the money made from the business was used to buy the properties, which should make him a rightful owner.

Legal Battles Begin

  1. Property Sharing Case: Chellappan asked for the properties to be divided, saying they were jointly owned.
  2. Property Recovery Case: M. Manikandan, Manickavasagam's son, filed a case to get back the property where Chellappan had his business.
  3. Business Interference Case: Chellappan tried to stop anyone from interfering with his business on the property.

Court's Findings

  • No Proof of Partnership: The court found no proof that Chellappan was a partner in the business. The properties were bought by Manickavasagam alone.

  • Will Validity: The court confirmed that a will by Manickavasagam, which gave the properties to his children, not Chellappan, was valid. Witnesses supported the will's authenticity.

Final Judgment

The court rejected Chellappan's attempts. It confirmed that the properties were not shared family assets but belonged to Manickavasagam and his children. Chellappan was given three months to leave the property.

"The judge rightly decided that the properties belonged entirely to M. Manikandan and his siblings."

Conclusion

Chellappan's claim to the properties was turned down because there was no proof of shared ownership or partnership. The court's decision supported Manickavasagam's children, confirming their right to inherit the properties.

Tags:
Property Rights
Inheritance Proceedings
Will Validity