Quick Summary: Shaik Mohd Ali's request to arrest several people was rejected after the investigation showed the accusations were not true. The court decided no further action was needed.
Shaik Mohd Ali filed a request asking the court to order the arrest of several people, claiming they were involved in a plot and fraud against him. He also wanted the police to protect his property.
Shaik Mohd Ali accused Solanki Balaji, S Radha, Dharamchand Jain, and Shiman Shu Roy Chitranjan Roy of plotting against him, cheating, and entering his property without permission. He claimed they were ignoring a court order that protected his property. The police had registered these allegations under a case number.
"Petitioner seeks arrest of respondents and protection for his property due to alleged criminal activities."
The case was heard by Judge N. Tukaramji. The petitioner's lawyer, Mr. V. Bramaiah Chowdary, argued for action against the people accused. The state's lawyer, Mr. R. Laxmikanth Reddy, represented the state and police.
The police looked into the case and submitted a report on June 30, 2017. They said the case was 'false', meaning they found no proof to support the accusations.
"Investigation report filed as 'false'; no evidence found."
Based on the investigation results, Judge N. Tukaramji rejected the request as unnecessary. The court decided there was no reason to continue with the case since the issues were already resolved.
"Petition dismissed as unnecessary; no further action needed."
The court decided that Shaik Mohd Ali's request did not need any further action, and all other related requests were also closed without any costs charged to anyone.
