Summary: Dabur India Limited secured a major victory in the Delhi High Court against several fake domain names. The court ordered a strong injunction, ensuring protection of Dabur’s trademarks and directing domain registrars to follow the rules.
Dabur India Limited, a well-known brand, found itself fighting against the unauthorized use of its trademarks in domain names. These domains were tricking the public by pretending to be real Dabur entities, offering fake distributorships and franchises. On March 3, 2022, the court granted a temporary order against these domains, which was later extended on April 25, 2022, and February 15, 2025.
The court, led by Justice Prathiba M. Singh, noted that the fake domains were registered with false details, making it hard to find the people responsible. The domains were using Dabur’s trademark without changes, creating a high chance of tricking people.
Strong Injunction: The court issued a strong injunction against the fake domains, stopping them from hosting any misleading content or using Dabur’s trademarks.
Disclosure of Information: Domain registrars were ordered to share registrant details within 72 hours, including names, contact information, and payment details.
Blocking and Transfer: Fake domains are to be permanently blocked and transferred to Dabur upon request.
Grievance Officer Appointment: All domain registrars must appoint complaint officers in India to ensure they follow court orders.
The court emphasized that domain registrars must not offer privacy protection by default and should ensure transparency in registrant information. Registrars not following these rules may lose their protection under the IT Act.
The court's decision is a significant step in protecting trademark rights and preventing online fraud. It sets a strong example for taking action against the misuse of domain names, safeguarding both intellectual property and the public.
The court’s decision highlights the importance of accountability among domain registrars and the need for strong measures to prevent fraudulent activities online.
This case reinforces the legal framework protecting trademarks in India and underscores the judiciary's role in curbing digital fraud.
