Delhi HIgh Court

Delhi HC: Bail Granted Due to Unlawful Arrest in Nangloi Robbery Case

Updated
Feb 7, 2026 7:20 PM
delhi-hc-bail-granted-due-to-unlawful-arrest-in-nangloi-robbery-case

Lokesh, also known as Manish, got bail after being in jail for over 15 months. The case is about a robbery in Delhi, and the court found problems with how the arrest was done.

The Incident

On April 26, 2024, a robbery happened in Nangloi, Delhi. Three people broke into a house, and one of them, holding a knife, threatened the homeowner. They stole ₹2,50,000 in cash. Lokesh was caught with the stolen money and knife after being chased by the victim's relatives and locals.

"The person involved searched the house, found the cupboard key, and took Rs.2,50,000/- in cash."

Arrest and Legal Proceedings

Lokesh was arrested the same day. However, his lawyer argued that Lokesh wasn't told why he was being arrested, which goes against Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution.

"The person was not told why he was being arrested, either by speaking or in writing."

Legal Arguments

Lokesh's lawyer said that not telling him the reasons for the arrest was against the law. They mentioned several Supreme Court cases to back up their claim. The lawyer also noted that another person involved, Laxmi, was already given bail, suggesting Lokesh should be treated the same way.

Court's Decision

Justice Saurabh Banerjee, who handled the case, agreed with Lokesh's lawyer. The court decided that the arrest didn't follow legal rules, which was a good enough reason to give bail.

"Not following the constitutional rules in this situation is enough reason to let the person out on bail."

Bail Conditions

Lokesh must follow several rules while on bail: - Go to all court hearings. - Stay in Delhi unless allowed to leave. - Help with the investigation. - Keep his phone active and tell the police about any changes. - Stay away from any criminal activity or contact with witnesses.

Summary of Verdict

The court decided to grant Lokesh bail because his arrest didn't follow legal rules. This decision emphasizes the importance of respecting people's rights during legal processes.